COIT20249 Assessment Help

COIT20249 Assessment Help

COIT20249 Assessment HelpThis assignment is designed to develop a portfolio of resources that you can use during your degree. The compilation of your Portfolio is progressive throughout the term. Please refer to the Unit Profile to see how this assessment item relates to the Unit Learning Outcomes.Objectives

These objectives will be measured by the ‘closeness of fit’ to meeting the assessment requirements and the marking criteria.

General Assessment Criteria

Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.

All assessment items must focus on the topics given in the specifications for each item. Any assessment items outside the required topic may be awarded 0 (zero) marks.

All portfolio items require students to write about your views, reflections and/or experiences from a personal viewpoint. Therefore, all items must be written in first person unless other requirements are stated in a portfolio item. Various written communication conventions have been discussed in the unit content and you should follow the writing styles appropriate for each assessment item. Do NOT simply write in ‘conversational’ style even when writing in ‘first person’ perspective.

The length of each submission must be within the recommended range. If the submission significantly exceeds the maximum word count or the page length the marker will stop marking.

If you use Track Changes when writing your submissions, you must ensure that the submitted document is the final and correct version of the document. That is, if your submitted document contains Track Changes or Comments or any other editing marks it may be awarded 0 (zero) marks. It is your responsibility to submit the final and correct version of your Portfolio items.

Files that are auto-submitted will not be reverted to draft status except in extenuating circumstances. It is your responsibility not to leave draft assessments in Moodle at the due date and time if the files are not ready to be submitted for marking.

Academic Integrity

Students must write the Portfolio items themselves. You may be asked to prove that you have written the Portfolio items. You should keep evidence that you have written the Portfolio items yourself, for example, early drafts of your Portfolio items.

ALL assignments will be checked for plagiarism (material copied from other students and/or material copied from other sources) using TurnItIn. If you are found to have plagiarised material or if you have used someone else’s words without appropriate referencing, or if you have shared your work with other students, you will be penalised for plagiarism which could result in zero (0) marks for the whole assessment item NOT just the individual submission. In some circumstances a more severe penalty may be imposed.

The University’s Academic Misconduct Procedure is available in the policy portal

Useful information about academic integrity (avoiding plagiarism) can be found at:

CQUniversity referencing guides

Note: You need to ensure that your portfolio submissions are free of any spelling, grammatical and typographical errors before submission.

Formatting and Structure:

Each portfolio item should demonstrate a logical flow of discussion, and be free from typographical, spelling and grammatical errors. They should be prepared in MS-Word (or equivalent) using 12 point font, 1.5 line spacing and margins of 2.54 cm. Check each assessment page for any other specific requirements.

Students may use separate title/cover pages for each submission. Cover/title pages are not considered as a part of the word or page length.

COIT20249 Assessment Help


Submit each file individually into Moodle using the appropriate Portfolio links in the Assessment block for Assessment item 4 on the Moodle Unit website. Please note there should be four (4) files submitted; one file for each portfolio item. Be sure to check that the correct file is submitted for each portfolio item.

The due date for this assignment is in different Weeks:

Portfolio_1 is due at 4:00 pm on Friday of Week 7

Portfolios 2, 3 and 4 are due at 4:00 pm on Friday of Week 12.

It is STRONGLY recommended that students complete the work during the term using the timeframe suggested in the Requirements section below.

All uploaded documents must be fully submitted for marking. At the due date of the assessment Moodle will auto-submit files that have been uploaded and left as a draft. However, any files uploaded after the due date must be manually submitted. This means that if you have been granted an extension or are uploading a late assessment (after the due date) you must complete the Moodle submission process. Further details on completing the submission process are available via the ‘Moodle Help for Students’ link in the Support block of your Moodle website.

If your report is left as a draft in Moodle after the due date it will accrue a late penalty. Late submissions will attract penalties at 5% per day of the total available mark for the individual assessment item. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework) at 

Portfolio Items 

PORTFOLIO_1: Annotated Bibliographies and Recommendations (10 marks)


COIT20249 Assessment 3 is a Report for which you have to use at least 10 recent references and write several recommendations. At least 6 of these references must be academic references which are peer reviewed journal or conference papers and/or textbooks. Portfolio 1 requires students to begin their research by locating and evaluating two academic references that you can use for the Report.

Portfolio 1 Requirements

  1. Find 2 peer reviewed journal articles or conference proceedings that relate to your Report topic for this Term, using the ARE and Triple R frameworks you learnt in Weeks 2 and 3. Both references must be from the last 5 years (dated 2013 onwards) and must be directly relevant to the technology focus of the case study of the Report (Assessment 3). Do not use textbooks, working papers or government papers/reports etc. as references for this assessment (Portfolio_1). Check with your local lecturer if you are not sure about the papers you have selected.

In Week 3, you learnt about Annotated Bibliographies, in Week 5 you learnt about referencing, and in Week 6 you learnt about writing recommendations.

  1. Write an annotation and a recommendation for each of the references using those skills:
  • Annotation.
    • See pp. 132 – 134 in your Textbook and refer to Week 3 materials on Annotated Bibliographies.
    • The reference must be formatted in CQU APA style. You must provide the DOI or the URL for the selected reference.
    • Write the annotation in paragraph form.
  • Recommendation.
    • Select a finding or a suggestion relevant to your report topic from the conclusion/findings in the article.
    • Write a recommendation based on that selected finding/suggestion, formatted correctly as covered in Week 6 Report Writing Guidelines.
    • The recommendation must make sense in light of what you have written in the annotation.
  • Your written submission PLUS BOTH references must be uploaded into Moodle. You must download the articles you selected, and upload them into Moodle with your submission as evidence of accuracy of the articles. You must submit 3 files in total for Portfolio 1. If one or both references are not accessible by the marker, your submission will not be marked for that reference and the sections covered by it will receive 0 marks.

Marking criteria

For each reference:

Each annotation and recommendation will be marked as follows:


  • This assessment should NOT be written in first person perspective. Write in the third person perspective. See example in the Week 3 PPT for Annotated Bibliographies and the Week 6 Report Writing Guidelines for Recommendations.
  • Each annotation should be approximately 150 – 200 words but comply with the requirements for the number of sentences.
  • Each recommendation should be concise and no more than 40 – 50 words (maximum length).

Example layout

Reference 1:

Insert the reference, formatted in CQU APA style. Include the DOI or URL if available.

Annotation: written as a single paragraph – see requirements and marking criteria above.

Recommendation: correctly formatted as per the referencing guidelines in Week 6 materials.

Reference 2:

Insert the reference, formatted in CQU APA style. Include the DOI or URL if available.

Annotation: written as a single paragraph – see requirements and marking criteria above.

Recommendation: correctly formatted as per the referencing guidelines in Week 6 materials.

 Please note that a reference that may not receive any marks as a result of plagiarism and/or other misconduct matters may still be suitable to be used in the Report. Also a Reference that received high marks in Portfolio 1 may become irrelevant if the final version of your submission changes direction closer to the Report deadline. You can use these references for your report but use your judgement before you finalise the Report. As clearly mentioned in the ARE topic, Research and Evaluation are iterative in the ARE process

David Marks

Dear sir/Ma'am

Our dedication and hard work towards developing quality content has made us competent to provide excellent services to the clients as per their needs. We ensure plagiarism free writing obeying academic integrity and honesty making us a dedicated team towards developing original content helping students to ensure high grades. Our services are hassle free, timely yet at an affordable rate driving clients to avail it for a longer period of time making them loyal and satisfied towards us.

Services we offer:
Essay writing
Report writing
Assignment writing
Reflective writing
Proposal writing
Dissertation writing
Thesis writing
CDR writing
Annotated bibliography
PowerPoint presentation
Article/book review
Why us?
Plagiarism free original content
On-time services maintaining deadlines
Experienced writers
Plagiarism and Grammarly report
Dedicate Team Leaders and Quality Checkers
Subjects we cover:
Marketing management
Human resource management
Environmental science
Business studies
Political science
Journalism and Masscommunication

Declaration: Working with us will give you the opportunity to avail divergent range of academic services at affordable rates in assistance with the dedicated team having members from different disciplines holding high degrees in their respective domains. We are experienced in developing B-plan, writing dissertations and theses having employed highly qualified and experienced writers.

You can reach us at-
Oz Paper Help
1 Step 1